Thread:Raziel Reaper/@comment-38834301-20190518083250/@comment-4090850-20190518115442

I definitely agree with you on more sourcing. Whenever wrong or unconfirmed information is noted, I either remove it in the former's case, or flag it as needing citation in the latter case for temporary time before removal.

It's an issue that has been bugging me for a long while, but unfortunately, we lack both manpower and time to take care of it properly, so it happens slowly. In-game dialogues, newspapers, interviews with developers and guidebooks are always our primary source and should be used on the Wiki; however, most editors either flat out ignore that and write down their own speculations and suggestions.

For time being, if you ever see more wrong information, either remove it or discuss this with a staff member. In case of what you may consider plausible, yet unconfirmed information, use the citation needed template near it and take the discussion to the page's talk page; if nobody will reply or take note after a week or so, feel free to remove it.

Thank you for your concern about questionable additions to pages, I greatly appreciate it, and I hope that we will manage to remove every bit of untrue content across the Wiki.