Thread:The Supreme Argonian/@comment-17809593-20190327055738/@comment-17809593-20190328072734

Thank you for indulging me. Yes I dont have any objections towards locking the post, although it was hardly necessary as the conversation had long since ended and all of us had left it on good terms. And I understand how it may have looked from a moderator's point of view and why it was deemed necessary to lock the post. My concern is with The Supreme Argonian's firm response to the matter. I was flat out accused of being toxic when every step of the way all throughout the discussion I personally was being unequivocally civil with no hint at all of any hostility in any of my replies, as far as I can discern, and I purposefully left no room for anything I said to be interpreted as such by carefully drafting my responses before hand, and apologized when something I said could have been interpreted as hostile. If you were to quote any of my replies, where in all of it do you personally with your own set of eyes see anything I said that was without question disrespectfull? I can maybe see how it may have been viewed as harassing from a certain point of view, but only from the standpoint that the conversation dragged on as I continually reiterated my point and attempted to defuse any more misunderstandings, and full disclosure here this was more or less because I have obsessive compulsive disorder and can't leave something that matters to me unfinished, otherwise I wouldn't be here bothering a moderator who just threatened to ban me the other day. But then again the other users also continued to comment and continued pressing their own point. That is what a discussion is and there is nothing inherently harassing about it. I feel there was no room for my comments to be interpreted as negative, especially after we had cleared up the chain of misunderstandings later on in the discussion.

I feel that The Supreme Argonian misinterpreted my comments in spite of their tone and meaning being unmistakably clear, and unjustly accused me of toxic behavior. I feel The Supreme Argonian may lack the necessary comprehension skills to effectively judge when a user is being toxic, save for when the scenario is black and white. And once more in this instance it actually was black and white, as I was constantly voicing my intent to be as respectfull as possible and repeatedly apologized, and the other users involved openly ackowledged my efforts to do so. And yet despite all of that The Supreme Argonian still judged me as being toxic, asserted that I need to watch what I say to people despite clearly meeting the standard of civil conduct throughout the entire discussion, and then he alluded to the possibility of me being banned. I feel that this was unwaranted and there is no excusing such misconduct. I feel The Supreme Argonian may not possess the reasoning skills required to effectively carry out his duty as a moderator if he reacted in such a way despite how crystal clear my attempts to remain civil and respectfull were.

I hope that my appeal here has brought some clarity to the situation, and ask that The Supreme Argonian acknowledge my concerns and give his input on the matter. Otherwise I fully intend to press the issue further still. Again I hope to hear back from you soon.