All posts by Raziel Reaper

In this case I have no objections about making him his own page.

Depends on if this information is enough to sustain a page on its own, and maybe his relevance not only to the narrative, but to the setting as well.

As for the characters you mentioned, I honestly have no idea why they have pages despite being so minor, and they should be either deleted or redirected to more relevant pages (be it a mission or a character with its own page).

Sigh...

First of all, as far as I know, the one being rude was you. You claim them being rude to you when they were just doing their jobs (and both were rather civil and mature while doing so, as well as friendly) and following guidelines and once you got a warning you tell them to shut up. Neither of them bullied you in any way or form, and if anything acted very tolerated towards your problematic and childish behavior.

Now secondly, as Masidillia just pointed out, you can just have everything you want to say under one message. Again, no need to spam threads with multiple messages back-to-back.

Finally, as I mentioned literally less than 20 minutes ago; if there is an issue of any kind, a mod will come to your posts whether you like it or not. It's their job. If you don't want mods to point out the issues with your posts and behavior, read the guidelines and follow them.

I hope this cleared some things up.

Well, a mod is here, and I'll be very brief in what I have to say; Harley, consider it the one and only warning from me; do not spam like that ever again, and calm yourself down whenever a mod or another user point something out to you. Also, no, if there is an issue with your posts, a mod WILL check this out.

If you don't want to get banned again, I suggest heeding my warning.

(Post taken from a reply on the user's second post regarding the matter)

The inclusion of the Topic is to keep posts organized, in correct places, if you will. Every post belongs to one specific category that keeps it and other similar posts under the same umbrella. It's also easier for people who search one particular post, for example, rather than going through dozens of posts all jumbled in one overarching category.

As for your post, I have unlocked it; it doesn't necessarily break our guidelines as it is relevant and somewhat on-topic, being a wiki/community-related post.

The inclusion of the Topic is to keep posts organized, in correct places, if you will. Every post belongs to one specific category that keeps it and other similar posts under the same umbrella. It's also easier for people who search one particular post, for example, rather than going through dozens of posts all jumbled in one overarching category.

As for your post, I have unlocked it; it doesn't necessarily break our guidelines as it is relevant and somewhat on-topic, being a wiki/community-related post.

A DLC about the adventures of Melvin and Fenton selling drinks across Lemoyne.

I think it was alright, especially when one considers it was almost unplayable when Capcom gave the rights to Rockstar Games. Even to this date it feels unique and somewhat one of a kind.

The reason your posts were getting locked is because they were deemed low-effort posts. Please refer to the Discussions Guidelines (which you can find on the right) for more information regarding that, and if you have an issue with any part of the Guidelines, feel free to ask any Discussions Moderator or Admin on their talk page/message wall.

I should also clarify that nobody here is an "owner" of this Discussions forum area. We are merely here to oversee and keep it civil. The Wiki and all of its properties, articles and features belong to Wikia, aka FANDOM.

With this, this post is locked. Apologies for the inconvenience, Gang Gang, and once more, refer to the Discussions area's Guidelines and feel free to ask us questions regarding it.

Lol, it's Bill. I can imagine him being drunk enough to wear his hat backwards.

Those look good, mate! I do find it funny how Escuella always gets forgotten though.

Depending on what you prefer: Special gives you a few single-player bonuses which are p sweet. Ultimate doubles on this with bonuses for the Online mode, plus if it's a physical copy you get a steel case. It really depends whether you want a few bonuses for your Online gameplay or not.

Ye he's the con man. It's been speculated a lot since his artwork was revealed, but no confirmation atm. Things will probably clear up when the game will be out.

I tend to act honorable for the most part, but the one exception is Thieves' Landing, which I used to massacre after cleaning the main story and most of the side shit.

Maybe yes, maybe not; obviously, he won't meet John, so keep that in mind. He might also just get some cameo and that's it, or have some run-ins with Arthur. For the time being I'm ruling out him encountering (at least directly) figures like Bill, Javier and Dutch himself as well, as from his dialogue he appears to know Bill solely as the Williamson gang leader rather than an ex-member of Dutch's gang (correct me if I'm wrong). However, retcons have and will happen, so who knows.

And it should be at least two years old as of 1899, as the 1914 edition of the newspaper mentions Johnson was a sheriff for 17 years prior to retiring, placing the year he became one as 1897. It's probably older but who knows until RDR2's release.

No idea, but it's at least two years old as Johnson became its sheriff circa 1897.

It's kinda is; in Houser's words, "it's in its own universe", and the references to Revolver in Redemption via Jack's book and campsites border more towards easter eggs than any confirmation, not to mention the somewhat wackier stuff in Revolver simply has no place in Redemption's more 'realistic' setting.

For its time it was a pretty damn good game, and I still consider it to be one of the more immersive open worlds in gaming. Although it did age badly when it comes to some world design choices and controls lol.

There are some factors I guess.

First of all, brand recognizing, as Redemption 1 is often considered one of the best games of last gen and in general, so slapping a 2 on it is definitely more worthwhile for the publisher and investors. Meanwhile, Revolver is generally considered a moderate success at its best, selling less than a million copies in PAL areas by 2010 iirc, and scoring average to barely positive reviews overall.

It basically got the GTA treatment, which was simply taking the basic premise and concept of the original games (which, while selling rather well for the time, were considered clunky and outdated), and rebuilding everything around it resulting in GTA3, which also ignores the previous games and starts its own canon.

Revolver was definitely a project the Houser brothers and their co-workers appreciated and liked, given that they bought the rights of the IP and finished it after Capcom cancelled, and even went on to give it a successor game, but tbh it doesn't seem too worthwhile for them to acknowledge Revolver's narrative and elements in a future game beyond some references and easter eggs or some love letter DLC like Legends and Killers.

Maybe Revolver will get some sort of a 'true' sequel or a game that takes more ideas from its bag rather than its successor's, but right now Rockstar prefers focusing on the Redemption 'universe' of the series.