4,675
pages
ALL POSTSRD3
<p>Now, I know RD3 is a long ways away but I think the next red dead should drop redemption off. We should have a brand new story about a brand new character. I would personally have it take place about 5 years from revolvers ending so we could see red harlow. </p>
What do you think?
Yes, good idea
No, I don't like it
41 Votes in Poll
(Edited by administrators)
2
I would drop the gay off your poll if you can edit it, not sure what’s gonna happen when the mods see it
1
<p>Red dead I can only accept maybe a dlc for 2 but this should be the end of it. In regards a story about another Red dead revolver 2 yea I'm okay with that but it shouldn't be called redemption 3 in my opinion, and another prequel would be kinda wierd, if they were to do some Van der Linda gang stuff. Yes we'll get to see what happend in their "golden age" but at the same time I don't see a point anymore. You know how they meet their end there's no anticipation about their future. Red dead 2 was a good ideea because the gang was maninly shrouded in mistery and so was Dutch's demise and all. Red dead 2 should be the last read dead, it was a great game but I see no point in another game. </p>
<p>Wasn't this literally made like five days ago</p>