. . . . . . . So in chapter 4 you find out that a man named Bronte kidnapped Jack from the gang. So it's pretty obvious that Bronte is the bad guy... right...? No. Jack's time with Bronte was the best time he ever had. Yes, a kid SHOULD grow with his parents, but what if the parents can't properly take care of the kid? Abigail had hard times even properly clothing Jack, and needed a loan from Arthur. And Jack eats nothing but whatever slime Pearson manages to make. He lived his whole life without seeing anyone his age, surrounded by bloodthirsty maniacs and a ruthless "father". But Brone... Bronte fed him quality food, gave him warm and clean clothes. Bronte gave Jack whatever Jack could ever wish. Jack lived in a big luxurious house with Bronte protected by an entire militia. While with the gang he lived outside surrounded by malaria mosquitoes and exposed to the cold at night. Jack even gets badly sick because of the gang constant travels at the beginning. He is chased by practically every gang and law enforcers in America because of actions he couldn't control. If you ask me, the GOOD thing the gang could've made was to leave Jack with Bronte and let him grow safely with him instead of ending up dead from some random shootout. Yes I know, in the end Jack somehow by a miracle survives the craziness and ends up as the last gunslinger at the end of the first game. Which is a career that most likely got him killed afterwards. So, Bronte raising Jack >>>>>>>>>> Jack living as a lowlife scum. Anyone else agrees?