I know we all love the idea love the idea of a rdr3 set as a prequel about the gangs formation but what about a game where you play as charles where he starts his family in Canada. Thoughts?
I know we all love the idea love the idea of a rdr3 set as a prequel about the gangs formation but what about a game where you play as charles where he starts his family in Canada. Thoughts?
Rather OT but, speaking of Charles, I keep getting nudges to deliver eagle feathers to him, but he's already gone to Canada as far as I know (this is after a certain amount of vengeful bounty-hunting with him and Sadie). Is this a glitch or is there a way of meeting up with him again?
They shouldn’t call the game Red Dead 3, it should be called something else tbh if they’re going to make it another prequel. A game set after the events of Red Dead 1 would be boring in my opinion as after John’s death, the Wild West is over and Jack becoming an outlaw is like shitting on Arthur, John and Abigail’s graves as the last thing they wanted was Jack to become an outlaw.
There should not be another fucking prequel. I love the red dead series more then any other game, they do not need another prequel. It probably won't even be another redemption, it'll be red dead something else. With whole new characters and a whole new setting.
Maybe as a spin off. But I think there should be a new idea and protagonist explored.
Just a whole new story like a continuation of RDRevolver or maybe even farther back like post civil war in the 1870's or maybe even during the war just out west with minor conflicts
Honestly, that would be great. He was quickly one of my favorite characters in RDR2 and would love to explore him some more
I think the only rational way for the VDLG to be involved in any sequels would have to go to the beginning of Dutch and hosea forming the gang. I’d probably prefer the story to follow Dutch but maybe the different chapters follow each. Colm O’Driscoll would probably be the lead antagonist and part of the game can Center around recruiting the gang.
We would? I personally don't want an RDR3, and if I did I certainly wouldn't want it to be about the gang. That'd be beating a dead horse at that point.
They should make a red dead where you be Ned Kelly
I think RDR3 should follow someone unrelated to the Van der linde gang during the Civil War with fighting in Oklahoma and Texas
What do you think?