Was the assault on his mansion what allowed the Pinkerton to learn about the gang’s presence and therefore the root cause of the failure of the Saint Denis bank robbery, or it did it simply remove another of the gang’s enemies from the city and help them, with the Pinkertons intervening in the bank robbery due to other reasons? (Bearing in mind that Micah only became a mole after Guarma, not before, according to Milton).
Was Bronte’s death an example of when Dutch broke his “revenge is a fool’s game” mantra? If so, does this suggest that it was why the bank robbery failed?
Within the gang, Hosea was always against killing Bronte, while John blamed the decision to go after Bronte as why the bank robbery failed. On the other hand, Dutch wanted to go after Bronte all along and never said afterwards that it was a mistake (bear in mind that he is generally very reluctant to admit failure). Arthur thinks similarly to Dutch on this, though to a lesser extent.