Simple: Arthur has a revolver, automatic pistols, semi-automatic shotgun, 14-shot rifles, and the Dead Eye

Robin Hood hides in a tree and waits for Arthur to come along so he can shoot him, Arthur is struck in his shoulder, then whips around and using dead-eye Vietnam's the fuck out of the tree with a fire bottle and Robin Hood gets roasted alive.

Napalm the tree like it’s 68’

LoL if it's Hawkeye Hawkeye wins easy

Arthur would win because he is the main character of rdr2’s story and this wiki is a fan club of it so this is very biased.

The connections are that: In their stories, both are skilled outlawed marksmen. While they are technically criminals they are nowhere near as bad as some other characters in the universe,

Robin hood is fast, but you can dodge an arrow... emphasis on can. He also quite able to take on the Sheriff of Nottingham alone having to recruit a small army.

Arthur is crazy fast and could kill a whole town with one other guy, so if Robin Hood even peaked, Arthur would set a bullet between his eyes.

@AMNK24 Well, it’s like asking if a caveman would win against a Soldier from the renaissance. More tech=More chance. Even if on a “Robin Hood Wiki” they would agree that a man with the ability to slow down time and also has weapons century’s ahead of the archer would win. Oh and can take bullets to the head without even flinching. (I think he does indeed flinch but you get the point)

Things like "can take bullets to the head without even flinching" or how "As Arthur, I could pull an Andrew Jackson and get shot in the chest and still win the duel." are more so game mechanics rather than actual durability he has. (After all, he did get his sickness from a bullet in the first place).

Uh I'm pretty sure he didn't get his sickness from a bullet

Also who actually chose Robin Hood?