On second thought, I'm sure R* would have allowed for players to witness violent, on-screen rape. Par for the course, that totally seems up their alley.
In all seriousness; extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Contrary to the apparent prevailing mindset in the media sphere that every claim is true until it is thoroughly debunked, the burden of proof lies with those making the claims.
There were a few leaks containing information that turned out to be true prior to the release of the game and what all those had in common aside from that was the fact that they didn't contain wildly graphic and off kilter rubbish.
While some details of it were discovered to be true, it also contains a glaring amount of obviously false information.
My theory was that some degenerate had taken some information from a post that contained actual accurate/unfinished details to make their additions seem more legitimate.
^Chronologically, yes.
Simple; Guideline #4
Making a not-so-subtle reference to two users that had been involved in a recent inflammatory post is a clear derailment of the post at hand.
The post was locked, and the users in question have been warned. It does not need to extend beyond that, especially being invoked in an unrelated post.
At any rate, welcome back and Happy Holidays!
Schrödinger's ex
Ah, I never fully appreciated this last time around. I was ecstatic to see you return for another year!
I would like a magic lantern, for entertaining people with scenes of my homeland.
"I believe most of the discussions on this wiki are ridiculous nonsense so I'm going to use it as an excuse to continue bringing up a particular post of ridiculous nonsense that was explicitly shutdown because I have nothing better to do than try and stoke the pot!" 🤪
Away with you, Mister Scrooge. Maybe you'll have a better outlook come Christmas Day.
Whatever happened on the GTA Wiki should unironically stay on the GTA Wiki.
Why do you feel the need to mention your less than stellar reputation on the GTA Wiki in so many of your posts?
> It's quite strange Edgar and Archer aren't in the final shootout in The Last Enemy That Shall Be Destroyed
The same answer I gave the last time this was posted;
John was still questioning if Jack was his as late as Chaper 2.
Not so much a "problem", more so an obtuse view of the characters. Claiming the characters are essentially "interchangeable" simply because they share a few traits honestly speaks to a particular lack of media literacy.
Andrew Milton was an individual who believed himself to operate within the confines of the law, which while contradicted by a few of his actions, he seemed to very much believe. He made attempts to approach members of the Van der Linde gang, risking all but certain death in one instance, to seemingly offer an olive branch to most of them in exchange for their cooperation.
Edgar Ross viewed himself as above the law, seizing on his newfound and not yet fully defined authority to involve other government forces in his investigations. He clearly took it further through enforcing his demands with outright threats as well as deciding to leave less loose ends.
Milton can very much be seen as a mentor to Ross, retroactively adding another layer to Ross's character in that he has a predecessor whose ideals he drew from and took further and mistakes he learned from.
Because that's not often how it is in real-life either.
While their relationship could be considered underdeveloped, that doesn't mean Andrew Milton is void of character or completely eliminate his purpose as a character, for that matter.
Personally, it always struck me as similar to the fact that Anthony Comstock inspired the likes of J. Edgar Hoover with his surveillance methods through his abuse of authority, which the latter expanded to a remarkably larger scale in his eventual career as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Mentor and protégé.
Most media literate Red Dead fan
And everybody clapped! 👏
Quite the necropost.
But to my knowledge, the game code does in fact prevent the player from possessing more than one of the same special gun.
The Gray family killing Sean McGuire makes them infinitely better than the Braithwaites.
Half-jokes aside, the Grays certainly show themselves to be a bit more willing to put their past as slavers behind them, considering they don't affiliated with the racist, neo-confederate militia that is the Lemoyne Raiders.