All posts by GaminDude2000

Ok, but it wasn't sadder for you, it was sadder for almost everyone. I know, I don't get it either.

Obviously not, can't believe this is a question.

You're offended by hammerspace? In a Rockstar game? That already has hammerspace to begin with?

He's British Of Course

Are you seriously asking?

Saints Row Redemption.

Dude, they're the same.

No. Rockstar can't count for shit.

Well, you've got the gang's horses.

Nope, certainly not forced. He didn't even have to force himself.

He was born that way. Some people are just a lost cause.

The second, chronologically.

They both have a good story, but RDR2 has pretty awful gameplay.

Poor Nastas :(

No. The answer is no.

Despite being beaten savagely, Arthur had a more peaceful death (yes, he canonically had good honour, and I won't hear otherwise), whilst John sacrificed for his family and was blown apart. I'd say John, because he had more to live for.

Arthur met Dutch and Hosea at age 14.

Wow, very interesting.

Really good literacy skill, pal.

Well, I certainly didn't fucking cry, because I'm not a little princess, but I kept the very first Tennessee Walker to the very end (along with the black Shire from Hosea), so I was happy that Arthur stayed with it 'til the end. I was also happy that I got the canon ending (high honour, go with John). I intend to do both again on my second playthrough.