FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hello, I'm going to have to ask you to stop changing the terms of "secondary antagonist" or adding "tritagonist" etc. We've had a problem with users doing so in the past and all edits regarding this will be reversed.

      Loading editor
    • no problem. i was just wondering why?

        Loading editor
    • A couple of reasons:

      1) It’s subjective. Who is the quinary protagonist of Redemption 2? I don’t know, and everyone would give different answers. Reason? No such role exists, so it’s purely speculation to say, for example, that Javier has the role in question. This is just an example, but it showcases how these supposed roles are not clear-cut, and therefore not worthy of mention.

      2) The roles are fairly grouped. For example, Dutch and Bill are both considered "one of the primary antagonists [of Red Dead Redemption]", but it doesn’t mean that their roles are equal. Instead, it both means that they have a significant role as antagonists, which is all that needs mentioning. Delving any further is unnecessary and, as the first point mentioned, subjective. It makes it very convoluted, when the only purpose of the article's introduction is a brief outline of their role. Any more information on it is irrelevant.

      I hope this makes sense.

        Loading editor
    • Now i get it. Thanks for clarifying :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I'm an admin for the Red Dead Wiki community. Welcome and thank you for your edit to Dutch van der Linde!

    If you need help getting started, check out our help pages or contact me or another admin here.

    For general help, you could also stop by Community Central to explore the forums and blogs.

    Enjoy your time at Red Dead Wiki!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.